District of Columbia v. Carter
United States Supreme Court
409 U.S. 418, 93 S. Ct. 602, 34 L. Ed. 2d 613 (1973)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Carter (plaintiff) was arrested without probable cause by John R. Carlson (defendant), a District of Columbia police officer. Carlson beat Carter with brass knuckles while two other police officers held Carter. Carter sued Carlson in federal district court pursuant to both common-law tort theory and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Carter also sued the precinct captain, the police chief, and the District of Columbia (district) (defendants), alleging negligent failure to train and supervise Carlson. The district court dismissed Carter’s complaint. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to state a cause of action pursuant to both theories of liability and that acts engaged in under the law of the district are acts engaged in under color of state law for purposes of § 1983. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.