District of Columbia v. Facebook, Inc.

Case No. 2018 CA 8715 B (2019)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

District of Columbia v. Facebook, Inc.

District of Columbia Superior Court
Case No. 2018 CA 8715 B (2019)

AR

Facts

The District of Columbia (plaintiff) filed a complaint against Facebook, Inc. (defendant) for failing to protect consumers’ personal data in violation of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act. A defendant violated the act by misrepresenting or failing to state a material fact that had a tendency to mislead a consumer. Specifically, the district alleged that Facebook allowed a university researcher to use an application to harvest personal data, which data he then sold to another third party, Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm. The data came from thousands of users. The district alleged that Facebook failed to inform the public regarding information use, failed to protect consumer data, and failed to enforce their consumer-protection policies. In its complaint, the district stated that Facebook violated the act by falsely promising consumers that it would protect the privacy of consumers’ personal information, would require applications and third-party developers to respect the privacy of consumers’ personal information, and would control how those applications used the data through contracts between consumers and third-party applications. In its defense, Facebook pointed to a Statement of Rights and Responsibilities that stated, “Facebook is not responsible for the actions . . . of third parties” and “[Facebook] require[s] applications to respect [users’] privacy, and [users’] agreement with the [third party] application will control how the [third party] application can use, store, and transfer that content and information.” Finally, Facebook also included a statement that it may share some data with partner companies to improve its service. Facebook moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Saddle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership