Dithiocarbamate Task Force v. Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
98 F.3d 1394 (1996)
- Written by Jennifer Flinn, JD
Facts
Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) listed several carbamate-based products and their waste streams as hazardous wastes. Those products, which consisted of four classes of carbamate compounds, were used as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides and were also used by the rubber, wood, and textile industries. If the EPA listed a waste as hazardous, that waste was then included in a certain list, based on its assigned code, in accordance with the RCRA. Wastes generated by the manufacturing process were listed as K wastes. Chemical products or their intermediates that were hazardous if discarded or intended to be discarded were listed as U wastes. RCRA regulations required the EPA to consider 11 factors when determining how to list hazardous wastes. The Dithiocarbamate Task Force (task force) (plaintiff), which consisted of manufacturers who make or use various carbamate-based products, filed a lawsuit challenging some of the K and U listings.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.