Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

DJ Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
86 F.3d 1130 (1996)


Facts

DJ Manufacturing Corporation (DJ) (plaintiff) entered into a contract with the United States (government) (defendant), under which DJ would provide combat field packs to troops participating in Operation Desert Storm. Under the contract, liquidated damages would be assessed at one-fifteenth of 1 percent of the contract price for each day that delivery of an article was delayed past the specified delivery deadline. DJ missed several delivery deadlines. The government withheld payment of approximately $663,000, which represented a reduction of about 8 percent from the total contract price. DJ sued the government to recover the withheld amount, arguing that the contract’s liquidated damages clause was an unenforceable penalty. Both parties moved for summary judgment. DJ presented an affidavit from its president stating that the contract’s liquidated-damages rate was a standard rate used in many government contracts rather than a rate selected specifically for the parties’ contract. The government’s contracting officer stated that the liquidated damages clause was included in the contract because of the need to move war-related items such as DJ’s combat field packs into the possession of troops as soon as possible. The United States Court of Federal Claims entered summary judgment in favor of the government. DJ appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.