Doe D. Gilbert v. Ross
Court of Exchequer of Pleas
151 Eng. Rep. 696 (1840)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Lessors of Doe D. Gilbert (plaintiff) sued Ross (defendant) in connection with property Gilbert allegedly obtained from A. G. Miller, who died in 1832. The best evidence that Miller ever owned the property was a 1789 deed that pertained to the property in question and another property owned by Weetman. Baxter, Ross's lawyer, held the deed as security for a debt Weetman owed and refused to produce the deed in court. The trial court did not call Weetman to testify as to the deed's contents. The lessors proffered secondary evidence: (1) an attested copy of the deed, which the judge rejected because it lacked an official stamp, and (2) a shorthand note of the deed's contents, which the judge admitted because it had been used as evidence in other litigation. The trial court ruled in favor of the lessors and Ross appealed. Ross argued that in the absence of the original deed, the attested copy was better evidence than the shorthand note and therefore the trial court improperly admitted the note as evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lord Abinger, C.B.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.