Doe ex rel. Doe v. Board of Education of Connecticut

753 F. Supp. 65 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe ex rel. Doe v. Board of Education of Connecticut

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
753 F. Supp. 65 (1990)

  • Written by Ann Wooster, JD

Facts

A male student (plaintiff) completed five academically successful years in the gifted program for kindergarten through fifth grade public-school students in Darien, Connecticut. In the sixth grade, the student became so depressed and violent that his parents chose to hospitalize him at a residential treatment facility and sought tuition reimbursement from the school district. The parents claimed that their son was a socially and emotionally maladjusted child and was an exceptional child in need of special education at a residential facility under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, later known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The school district rejected the claims. On the parents’ appeal from the school district’s decision, a state administrative-due-process officer agreed with the school district that the student was not eligible for benefits under the IDEA. The parents brought suit on behalf of the student in the district court against the Board of Education of Connecticut (school board) (defendant) to appeal the state administrative officer’s decision that the student was not entitled to special education. Teachers and doctors testified that the student could be aggressive and destructive toward other children, but his grades and achievement-test results were always satisfactory or higher. The student’s parents claimed that the state administrative officer’s decision violated the right to a free and appropriate education under the IDEA and requested that the district court order the school board to reimburse tuition and related expenses at the residential facility.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burns, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership