Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
766 F.3d 1013 (2014)


Facts

Nestle USA, Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill Incorporated Company, and Cargill Cocoa (defendants) controlled the majority of the cocoa produced in the Ivory Coast. However, the use of child slave labor in the Ivory Coast to produce cocoa was confirmed by many domestic and international organizations. The defendants provided both financial assistance and technical farming assistance to the cocoa farms in the Ivory Coast, including visiting the farms a few times per year for training and quality control. Additionally, the defendants lobbied against potential federal reforms designed to curb the use of child slaves. Three former child slaves (plaintiffs) were forced to work on the cocoa plantations in the Ivory Coast. The plaintiffs: (1) worked up to 14 hours per day, six days a week; (2) were locked in small rooms at night; (3) were not allowed to leave the plantations and were aware of brutal punishments for failed escapees, like having feet cut open and being forced to drink urine; (4) were only given scraps of food to eat; and (5) were whipped and beaten. The plaintiffs sued the defendants, alleging liability under the Alien Tort Statute and seeking class-action status. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants aided and abetted child slavery by providing assistance to the cocoa farmers. The defendants moved to dismiss the claims, and the trial court granted the motion. The plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Nelson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Rawlinson, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.