Doe v. 2TheMart.com. Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
140 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (2001)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
InfoSpace was a company that ran a website called Silicon Investor. Silicon Investor contained a series of online bulletin boards. One of these bulletin boards was devoted to 2TheMart.com (TMRT) (defendant), a publicly traded company. Investors and members of the public would post anonymously on the bulletin board, discussing the latest news about the company, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the company. Some of the posts on the bulletin board were extremely negative towards TMRT. The posts were archived and readily accessible. TMRT was engaged in a lawsuit in which TMRT shareholders alleged that TMRT’s officers committed fraud. In that suit, TMRT raised 27 defenses. One defense was that the drop in TMRT’s stock price was not caused by the actions of TMRT’s officers, but that the price drop was actually due to illegal manipulation by the anonymous posters on the Silicon Investor message board. TMRT issued a subpoena to InfoSpace, seeking identifying information about several posters on the Silicon Investor board. NoGuano (plaintiff) was the username of one the posters whose information TMRT sought. NoGuano filed a motion to quash TMRT’s subpoena, citing a First Amendment right to anonymous communication.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Zilly, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.