Doe v. Belleville Public School District No. 118

672 F. Supp. 342 (1987)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Belleville Public School District No. 118

United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
672 F. Supp. 342 (1987)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Johnny Doe (plaintiff) was a six-year-old child diagnosed with hemophilia and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Doe was preparing to enroll as a first-grade student in Belleville Public School District No. 118 (district) (defendant). The district was notified of Doe’s conditions, and after analyzing his case, the district created a policy for children with communicable diseases that the district used to place Doe. The district did not follow state guidelines for placing children with contagious diseases, opting to create a new process. The newly created policy provided that an interdisciplinary committee would review Doe’s case and determine his school placement, and the decision could be appealed only to the district itself. The committee appointed by the district decided to exclude Doe from the normal classroom and instead provide him with a private tutor. Doe filed suit against the district in federal court, claiming that the district discriminated against him in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. The district filed a motion to dismiss and argued that Doe’s claim arose under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA), later renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The district claimed that under the EHA, the court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the case because Doe had not exhausted his state-law administrative remedies before filing his claim. The court addressed whether Doe was considered disabled under the EHA and subject to the exhaustion requirement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Foreman, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership