Doe v. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
851 F.3d 7 (2017)
- Written by Kelly Nielsen
Facts
Using the pseudonyms John Doe and Kidane to maintain his anonymity, a man (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Ethiopia) (defendant) in United States federal district court. Kidane alleged that he had been tricked into downloading a program that allowed the government of Ethiopia to spy on him. Kidane alleged that the tortious spying occurred from abroad while Kidane was in the United States. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the government of Ethiopia had sovereign immunity from being sued in a United States court. Kidane argued that his privacy-invasion claim qualified for the FSIA’s noncommercial-tort exception to this sovereign immunity. The district court ruled that the tort alleged in the complaint did not qualify for the noncommercial-tort exception and, therefore, that the government of Ethiopia’s sovereign immunity protected it from Kidane’s lawsuit. The district court dismissed the complaint. Kidane appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

