Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Doe v. Gonzaga University

Washington Supreme Court
24 P.3d 390 (Wash. 2001)


Facts

John Doe (plaintiff) was a student in the teaching program at Gonzaga University (Gonzaga) (defendant). During his time as a student, Doe had sexual relations with Jane Doe, another student. The following year, Roberta League, Gonzaga’s teacher certification specialist, overheard student Julia Lynch talking about how John Doe had sexually assaulted Jane Doe, and how she was unhappy Gonzaga had not done anything to investigate the incident. League told another school official, Dr. Susan Kyle, about the incident and the two decided to conduct an investigation. League and Kyle interviewed Lynch who said Jane Doe told her she had been sexually assaulted by John Doe three times. Gonzaga further investigated the crime with multiple witnesses. However, John Doe was not informed of the investigation against him. Gonzaga interviewed Jane Doe about the incident, but she was equivocal in her testimony. After the school concluded its investigation, the Dean of the School of Education concluded John Doe was not fit to be licensed as a teacher due to problems with his moral character application from the incident. The Dean only told John of this a month later, and told him he had no right to appeal the situation. John Doe brought suit against Gonzaga for defamation. At trial, a videotaped deposition of Jane Doe corroborated his story, and Jane Doe stated there were false statements in many of the key declarations in the school’s investigation. The jury awarded John Doe $500,000 for defamation, and other damages for other counts, including invasion of privacy. Gonzaga appealed. The appellate court reversed on the ground that Gonzaga could not be held liable for communications made among its own employees. John Doe appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ireland, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.