Doe v. Gonzales

449 F.3d 415 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
449 F.3d 415 (2006)

Facts

Following the attacks on September 11, 2001, Congress amended the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) with the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (PATRIOT Act). Under the PATRIOT Act, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (defendant) could issue national security letters (NSLs) to certain internet providers. NSLs were subpoenas that allowed the FBI to gain certain information related to authorized terrorism investigations or other intelligence activities. Under the PATRIOT Act, no recipients of NSLs could disclose to any person that they had received the letters. A group of providers (plaintiffs) who received NSLs sued the government (defendant), claiming that the provisions governing NSLs violated the First Amendment. Two district courts agreed. However, Congress then passed the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Reauthorization Act), which amended the provisions governing NSLs. Under the Reauthorization Act, recipients of NSLs were expressly allowed to speak to attorneys to obtain legal advice regarding the request for information.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Concurrence (Cardamone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership