Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Doe v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
3 F.3d 80 (1993)


Facts

John Doe (plaintiff), a law firm partner, was diagnosed with a rare and typically fatal form of blood cancer. Doe’s physician, Dr. Anderson, prescribed a course of chemotherapy treatment which reduced Doe’s number of cancerous cells. Anderson then recommended that Doe undergo a high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy combined with a bone marrow transplant. The cost of the treatment was estimated at $100,000. Doe sought health insurance benefits for the treatment from the law firm’s insurance provider, Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital Area (Blue Cross) (defendant). Several months before Doe’s request, Blue Cross had sent a letter to all of its group insurance contracts, including the law firm, informing them of coverage changes and updates. Blue Cross relied on the letter when it denied Doe’s request, noting that the amended contract excluded benefits for bone marrow transplants and “related” services. Doe and the law firm filed suit against Blue Cross under § 502 of the Employee Retirement Insurance Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Doe claimed that the denial of benefits was improper because Blue Cross had not complied with the requirements for providing timely notice to its providers regarding the changes and even if it was timely, the amendment language was misleading. The district court granted Blue Cross’s motion for summary judgment and Doe appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Niemeyer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.