Doe v. Mukasey

549 F.3d 861 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
549 F.3d 861 (2008)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (defendant) delivered a national-security letter (NSL) to John Doe, Inc. (Doe) (plaintiff), an Internet service provider (ISP). The FBI requested Doe to provide subscriber and service information for specific email addresses. The letter certified that the information sought was relevant to an investigation against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities. Further, the FBI’s letter advised Doe that the company was prohibited by law from disclosing the fact of having been asked by the FBI to provide the requested information (nondisclosure requirement). Doe and the American Civil Liberties Union (plaintiff) sued the FBI and other government actors (defendants), challenging the constitutionality of the statutes that regulated the issuance of NSLs, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2709 and 3511. The district court found that the statutes violated the First Amendment and ordered the FBI not to enforce the nondisclosure requirement. The government appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership