Doe v. Northwestern University

682 N.E.2d 145 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Northwestern University

Illinois Appellate Court
682 N.E.2d 145 (1997)

Facts

Northwestern University (defendant) provided dental services performed by students at Northwestern’s dental clinic. After discovering that one of the students providing dental care had HIV, the virus that caused AIDS, Northwestern sent a letter to everyone who had received dental care at the clinic informing them that one of the dental students had tested positive for HIV. The letter stated that the risk of any of the patients being infected with HIV as a result of the treatment was extremely low due to the precautions taken by the students that were designed to prevent the communication of diseases, including HIV. Attorneys for six of the patients (the patients) (plaintiffs) determined the identity of the HIV-positive student. The patients had all received treatment from the student, including some treatments involving extensive physical contact with the mouths of the patients. Several of the patients had bled during the treatments. The patients sued Northwestern for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract, and medical malpractice. The patients conceded that none of them had tested positive for HIV. However, they alleged that they had suffered damages in the form of physical distress and mental pain and anguish upon learning of the possibility that they had been infected with HIV. Northwestern presented studies showing that the chance of HIV transmission during medical treatment was very small. The court dismissed the lawsuit on the ground that the patients had failed to allege that they had been actually exposed to HIV. The patients appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McNulty, J.)

Concurrence (DiVito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership