Doe v. Northwestern University
Illinois Appellate Court
682 N.E.2d 145 (1997)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
Northwestern University (defendant) provided dental services performed by students at Northwestern’s dental clinic. After discovering that one of the students providing dental care had HIV, the virus that caused AIDS, Northwestern sent a letter to everyone who had received dental care at the clinic informing them that one of the dental students had tested positive for HIV. The letter stated that the risk of any of the patients being infected with HIV as a result of the treatment was extremely low due to the precautions taken by the students that were designed to prevent the communication of diseases, including HIV. Attorneys for six of the patients (the patients) (plaintiffs) determined the identity of the HIV-positive student. The patients had all received treatment from the student, including some treatments involving extensive physical contact with the mouths of the patients. Several of the patients had bled during the treatments. The patients sued Northwestern for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract, and medical malpractice. The patients conceded that none of them had tested positive for HIV. However, they alleged that they had suffered damages in the form of physical distress and mental pain and anguish upon learning of the possibility that they had been infected with HIV. Northwestern presented studies showing that the chance of HIV transmission during medical treatment was very small. The court dismissed the lawsuit on the ground that the patients had failed to allege that they had been actually exposed to HIV. The patients appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McNulty, J.)
Concurrence (DiVito, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.