Doe v. Poritz

662 A.2d 367 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Poritz

New Jersey Supreme Court
662 A.2d 367 (1995)

DC

Facts

In 1994, the New Jersey legislature passed a series of sex-offender registration and notification laws collectively known as Megan’s Law (the laws). The laws required registration by all sex offenders convicted after the laws’ effective date, and by sex offenders convicted before the effective date whose behavior was deemed repetitive and compulsive. For offenders who were no longer incarcerated, registration required an offender to be photographed, fingerprinted, and to provide personal details for a registration form. The registration form required an offender to list a physical description, offense committed, home address, school or employment address, vehicle information, and license plate number. Offenders whose conduct was deemed repetitive and compulsive were required to verify this information quarterly, whereas all other offenders were required to verify the information annually. The registration information was open to all federal and state law-enforcement agencies from any state. A previously convicted sex offender using the pseudonym John Doe (plaintiff) challenged the laws on constitutional grounds. The trial court upheld the laws, and Doe appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilentz, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership