Doe v. Reed
United States Supreme Court
130 S. Ct. 2811 (2010)
In Washington, 4 percent of the state’s voters are needed to place a referendum on an election ballot, and the petition must include the signers’ names and addresses. The petitions are then submitted to Washington’s secretary of state for validation. Under the Washington Public Records Act (PRA), private parties can request a copy of government documents, including referendum petitions. Two advocacy groups (defendants) requested copies pursuant to the PRA of a petition that called for a referendum for a law extending benefits to same-sex marriage. State voters (plaintiffs) who signed the petition with their names and addresses objected to the request, arguing that disclosure of their information would violate their First Amendment rights.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.