Doe v. Roe

93 Misc. 2d 201, 400 N.Y.S.2d 668 (1977)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. Roe

New York County Supreme Court
93 Misc. 2d 201, 400 N.Y.S.2d 668 (1977)

  • Written by Nicole Gray , JD

Facts

Dr. Joan Roe, a psychiatrist, and her husband, Peter Poe, a psychologist, (plaintiffs) published a book that included verbatim disclosures made by Doe (plaintiff) and her late husband during psychoanalysis treatments with Dr. Roe. Dr. Roe saw Doe for many years, and in that time, Doe discussed intimate topics, thoughts, emotions, fantasies, and issues involving her family life. Dr. Roe discussed the possibility of publishing a book with Doe while Doe was being treated and had received wavering oral consent, but never anything in writing. However, the book was published eight years after Doe had stopped seeing Dr. Roe. Many of Doe’s friends, colleagues, and students read the book, along with her employer, who threatened her job. Doe became reclusive, and her well-being and emotional health deteriorated. Doe incurred $1,400 in medical bills for psychotherapy and suffered $1,500 in lost wages. Doe sued Dr. Roe and Poe to enjoin sales of the book and for damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stecher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership