Doe v. United States

964 F. Supp. 1429 (1997)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Doe v. United States

United States District Court for the Southern District of California
964 F. Supp. 1429 (1997)

Facts

John Doe (plaintiff) was arrested when he was a juvenile for failing to pay a special tax on marijuana that had been exported. Doe pleaded guilty and was placed on probation for three years by federal authorities. Before the probationary period was up, Doe’s conviction was vacated, and his record was sealed. Doe indicated that the judge that sealed his record told him that he would not need to disclose the record to anyone after seven years. This led Doe to believe that his juvenile record would not affect his future employment. The statute that Doe violated was later repealed. For 27 years after the conviction, Doe was never arrested or convicted of a crime. Doe also worked in the auto-sales industry for 20 years. Doe was employed as a sales manager when a routine background check showed that he had been convicted as a juvenile. Federal law prevented a person who had been convicted of an offense involving dishonesty from employment with an institution that was federally insured. In addition, Doe’s employer had a policy of firing any employee with a past criminal conviction. Doe’s supervisor informed Doe that if he did not have his record expunged, he would be fired. Doe filed an action for equitable relief against the United States (defendant) to have his criminal arrest record expunged. The United States moved for dismissal or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The United States failed to show an interest in keeping Doe’s record and argued that there were no extraordinary circumstances in Doe’s case and that expunction should be reserved for extreme cases.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brewster, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership