Doering Equipment Co. v. John Deere Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
815 N.E.2d 234 (2004)
Doering Equipment Co. (Doering) (plaintiff) agreed to act as distributor for golf and turf products from John Deere Co. (Deere) (defendant). Doering lost money every year on its performance of the contract. Deere allegedly told Doering that it needed to purchase additional golf and turf products and add a salesperson for those products, and that these requirements were non-negotiable. Doering notified Deere that it was terminating the agreement. Doering sued Deere for a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and sought $500,000 in damages for its operating losses under the contract during the previous three years. The trial court found in Deere’s favor, holding that there was no causal connection between Doering’s damage claims and the additional demands Deere made on Doering. Doering appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kafker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.