Donahue v. Artisan Entertainment, Inc.

2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5930 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Donahue v. Artisan Entertainment, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5930 (2002)

SH

Facts

Heather Donahue, Michael Williams, and Joshua Leonard (plaintiffs) each executed an agreement with Haxan Films, Inc. to perform in the film The Blaire Witch Project (Blaire Witch 1). Paragraph 5 of each agreement provided: “It is agreed and understood that Haxan retains all rights to the results and proceeds of [performer’s] services to Haxan. Haxan retains the rights to dub into any language and to hire another [actor/actress] for this purpose. Haxan retains control of all tie-ins and merchandising rights. It is understood that as long as Haxan pays [performer], Haxan is not obligated to play [performer].” Artisan Entertainment, Inc. (defendant) then acquired the rights to Blaire Witch 1 under a licensing agreement with Haxan. Following the successful release of Blaire Witch 1, Artisan released Blaire Witch 2: Book of Shadows (Blaire Witch 2). Images of the plaintiffs appeared in Blaire Witch 2 and in promotional materials, as well as in subsequent television specials, books, and websites based on the Blaire Witch franchise. The plaintiffs sued Artisan for breach of contract, claiming that Artisan used their name and likeness without authorization because the grant of rights in their agreements related only to Blaire Watch 1 and the promotion thereof. Artisan filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing the language in Paragraph 5 constituted a broad and unlimited grant to Haxan of all rights to the fruit of the plaintiffs’ services, including all uses in question in the action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Koeltl, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership