Donald B. v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County

117 F.3d 1371 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Donald B. v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
117 F.3d 1371 (1997)

Facts

Donald B. (plaintiff) was a healthy six-year-old with a speech disability who attended a private school. The Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County (the district) (defendant) created an individual education plan that provided Donald with speech therapy at a public school three blocks away from the school Donald attended. Donald and his mother (plaintiff) requested that the district provide transportation for Donald between the two schools. The district declined to provide transportation, and Donald’s mother filed an administrative appeal of that decision. After the appeal was denied, Donald’s mother filed a claim in federal district court, alleging that the district’s denial of transportation violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The district court held that the district had no obligation under the IDEA to provide the requested transportation. Donald’s mother appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kravitch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership