Donovan v. Bachstadt
Supreme Court of New Jersey
453 A.2d 160 (1982)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
The Donovans (plaintiffs) agreed to purchase property from Bachstadt (defendant) for $58,900. Bachstadt agreed to finance $44,000 of the purchase price through a purchase money mortgage. The interest rate for the purchase money mortgage was not to exceed 10.5%. The Donovans subsequently discovered that Bachstadt could not obtain good title to the property. The Donovans therefore purchased a different home and obtained a mortgage loan at a rate of 13.25%. They brought suit against Bachstadt, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. They specifically sought to recover their loss of the benefit of the bargain, which they calculated as the difference between the 10.5% and 13.25% interest rates. The trial court found that Bachstadt had breached the contract but denied recovery of the difference in interest rates. The Appellate Division reversed, finding that the difference in interest rates could form the basis of compensatory damages if the plaintiffs have entered a comparable transaction for other real estate or would likely do so in the immediate future.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schreiber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
