Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Donovan v. Dewey

452 U.S. 594 (1981)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...

Donovan v. Dewey

United States Supreme Court

452 U.S. 594 (1981)

Facts

Congress passed the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the act). One provision of the act allowed the secretary of labor to inspect mines without a warrant. The act prescribed specific guidelines for mine inspections. Underground mines had to be inspected at least four times per year, and surface mines had to be inspected at least twice per year. Inspectors also could go to mines for inspection without advance notice to the mine owners. Owners who refused inspection could be sued in federal court by the Department of Labor. An inspector attempted to inspect a mine owned by Douglas Dewey (defendant), but the inspector was ejected from the mine. The secretary of labor, Raymond Donovan, brought suit in federal district court to enjoin Dewey from barring entry to his mines. The district court ruled for Dewey, finding that the search was not lawful unless the inspector had a warrant. Donovan appealed directly to the Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership