Donovan v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
757 F.2d 1376, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 919 (1985)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
DialAmerica Marketing, Inc. (DialAmerica) (defendant) was a telephone-marketing firm primarily engaged in selling magazine-subscription renewals over the phone. DialAmerica obtained the telephone numbers of magazine subscribers through its home-researcher program. The researchers picked up cards from DialAmerica containing the names and addresses of subscribers, then took the cards home and researched the telephone numbers of the subscribers. The researchers returned the cards one week later with the cards filled out in a manner prescribed by DialAmerica. The researchers chose their own hours and the numbers of cards to research. DialAmerica compensated the researchers at a set price per card. DialAmerica also hired distributors, who distributed work to the researchers. The distributors paid their own expenses and negotiated the compensation paid to the researchers. DialAmerica was sued by Raymond Donovan, the secretary of labor of the United States, for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. The district court held in favor of DialAmerica and found that the FLSA was inapplicable, because the researchers and the distributers were not employees within the meaning of the FLSA. Donovan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.