Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.
United States Supreme Court
429 U.S. 648, 97 S.Ct. 835 (1977)
- Written by Alexis Tsotakos, JD
Facts
Donovan (plaintiff), a sailor and then employee of Penn Shipping Co. (Penn) (defendant), slipped on wet paint and broke his wrist aboard one of Penn’s ships. He brought suit under the Jones Act and the jury found in his favor, awarding him a $90,000 verdict. Penn filed a motion requesting the court to remit the verdict as excessive. The court agreed to either remit the verdict to $65,000 or order a new trial. Donovan accepted the remitted award but did so under protest, reserving the ability to appeal the remittitur. The trial judge incorporated Donovan’s language in the order, and Donovan appealed the remittitur and requested a new trial. The court of appeals denied the appeal, upholding the settled rule that a plaintiff may not seek the reinstatement of a remitted judgment when he has accepted the remittitur. Donovan appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.