Donovan v. RRL Corp. I
California Court of Appeal
88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 143 (1999)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
Brian J. Donovan (plaintiff) saw an advertisement in the local newspaper from automobile dealer Lexus of Westminster (dealership) (defendant) for a 1995 Jaguar priced at $25,995. The next day, Donovan told the dealership he would buy the car for the advertised price. The dealership informed Donovan that the advertised price was a mistake and that the car was actually $37,016. Donovan accused the dealership of bait-and-switch advertising and tried to persuade the dealership to sell him the car at the advertised price. The dealership refused. Donovan filed suit for breach of contract on the ground that the advertisement constituted an offer that Donovan accepted. The trial court found that the advertised price was a mistake and returned a verdict for the dealership despite California Vehicle Code Section 11713.1 subdivision (e), which makes it unlawful for a dealership to fail to sell a vehicle at an advertised price. Donovan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rylaarsdam, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.