Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Douglas v. California

United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 353 (1963)


Facts

Meyes and Douglas (defendant) were jointly tried and convicted of 13 different felonies. They were both indigent and were represented by one public defender. The attorney requested a continuance when the trial began, claiming he was not as prepared as he should have been given the number of charges against his clients. He also claimed there was a conflict of interest between his clients, and the court should appoint separate counsel for each of them. The motion was denied. Meyers and Douglas then dismissed their attorney and renewed the motions for a continuance and separate counsel. The motions were again denied. Meyers and Douglas were convicted of all 13 felonies. They each appealed as of right. Both Meyers and Douglas requested the assistance of counsel on appeal but their requests were denied. The court of appeals affirmed their convictions. They then petitioned the state supreme court for discretionary review but their petitions were denied. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

Dissent (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.