From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc., et al.
United States Supreme Court
132 S.Ct. 1204 (2012)
In order to qualify for the federal Medicaid program and receive funds, states must submit a plan and any subsequent amendments to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) agency for review and approval. Before granting its approval, CMS reviews the state’s plan and amendments to ensure they comply with federal statutory and regulatory requirements. In 2008-2009, the California Legislature passed three statutes amending the state’s Medicaid plan which effectively reduced payments to medical providers. The state subsequently sent the amendments to CMS for review. Before CMS concluded its review, Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. and others (plaintiffs) filed a number of different suits in various federal district courts against Toby Douglas in his official capacity as director of California's Department of Health Care Services (defendant) claiming the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibited enforcement of the new amendments and seeking injunctive and declaratory relief that amendments conflicted with, and thus were pre-empted by, federal Medicaid law. The district courts reached varying decisions. The parties appealed. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals consolidated the lawsuits and held for Plaintiffs, striking down California’s Medicaid amendments as being pre-empted by federal Medicaid law. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari. Thereafter, CMS approved several of California’s amendments as being consistent with federal law. The parties agreed the case was not moot and the Court reviewed the case.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Roberts, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.