Douglas v. Willcuts

296 U.S. 1 (1935)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Douglas v. Willcuts

United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 1 (1935)

Facts

Edward B. Douglas (Douglas) (plaintiff) obtained a divorce from his wife, Mrs. Douglas, in 1923. In connection with the divorce, Douglas created and funded an irrevocable trust consisting of certain securities for Mrs. Douglas’s benefit. The trustee was instructed to pay income to Mrs. Douglas in an annual sum of $15,000 through 1927 and $21,000 thereafter. Douglas retained the right to choose securities for investment, and the securities would revert to him upon Mrs. Douglas’s death. The parties agreed that the trust was in lieu of, and in settlement of any claim to, alimony for Mrs. Douglas. The commissioner of internal revenue determined that the income generated by the trust in 1927 and 1928 was income to Douglas, and Douglas paid the assessed tax under protest. Douglas filed a refund claim, and it was disallowed. Douglas filed suit to recover the taxes paid, arguing that an irrevocable trust is not alimony and Mrs. Douglas should be the party liable for taxes due on the income as a separate taxpayer. The appellate court held that Douglas was liable for taxes due on the income.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hughes, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership