Dowdell v. Bloomquist
Rhode Island Supreme Court
847 A.2d 827 (2004)
Cheryl Dowdell (plaintiff) lived next door to Peter Bloomquist (defendant). Bloomquist petitioned the local zoning board for permission to build a second story on his home. Dowdell protested, fearing the addition would block her ocean view. Bloomquist then planted a row of 40-foot high trees along his property line, blocking most of the incoming sunlight from reaching Dowdell’s windows. Dowdell sued Bloomquist, alleging that Bloomquist only planted the trees to get revenge against Dowdell, in violation of a local spite-fence statute. The trial court found that Bloomquist had planted the trees out of spite and with malicious intent. The trial court then granted Dowdell injunctive relief. Bloomquist appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Flanders, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.