Doyle v. Holy Cross Hospital
Illinois Supreme Court
186 Ill. 2d 104, 237 Ill. Dec. 100, 708 N.E.2d 1140 (1999)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
Mary Doyle (plaintiff) was a nurse employed by Holy Cross Hospital (hospital) (defendant) beginning in 1960. In 1971, the hospital issued an employee handbook that specified certain criteria for identifying which employees would be affected in the event of an economically driven layoff. In 1983, the hospital added a new policy, which stated that the personnel policies contained in the handbook were subject to change from time to time and did not constitute an implied or express contract. The new policy also provided that the hospital could terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without notice. In 1991, the hospital discharged Doyle, along with three other nurses who were also employed before the 1983 disclaimer, without following the economic separation provisions of the 1971 handbook. Doyle and the other nurses sued the hospital for breach of contract. The trial court granted the hospital’s motion to dismiss, and the nurses appealed. The appellate court reversed, and on remand, the trial court entered another order of dismissal. The nurses appealed again, and again the appellate court reversed, holding that the hospital’s modification of the handbook terms was not enforceable against the nurses because it was not supported by consideration. The Illinois Supreme Court then allowed the hospital’s petition for leave to appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.