Draper v. United States
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 307 (1959)
An informant told police that James Draper (defendant) was a drug dealer who would be carrying narcotics through a train station within a particular date range. The informant gave police a detailed physical description of Draper including the clothing he would be wearing and told police that Draper would be carrying a tan zipper bag and that Draper was a fast walker. The police had received reliable information from this informant in the past. Police surveilled the train station on the dates provided to them by the informant. On the second day of surveillance, police observed Draper, who matched the physical description provided by the informant and was carrying a tan zipper bag, walking quickly through the train station. Police stopped Draper and arrested him. After arresting Draper, police searched him and found heroin and a syringe. Draper was charged with knowingly concealing and transporting narcotics, and he moved to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to the search, arguing that police did not have probable cause to arrest him without a warrant. The trial court denied Draper’s motion, and he was convicted. The court of appeals affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Whittaker, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.