Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Drashner v. Sorenson

Supreme Court of North Dakota
63 N.W.2d 255 (1954)


Facts

C.H. Drashner (plaintiff), A.D. Sorenson (defendant), and Jacob Deis (defendant) formed a partnership to operate a real estate, loan, and insurance business. Sorenson and Deis fronted $7,500 to purchase the business from its original owner. The parties had no written partnership agreement but orally agreed that the $7,500 would be repaid to Sorenson and Deis from partnership earnings. They also agreed on percentages which each partner would receive in commissions from their respective sales. Disagreements soon arose. Drashner neglected his duties, and also requested additional cash distributions from the partnership, which Sorenson and Deis refused to grant. In order to cash out his share of the partnership, Drashner sued Sorenson and Deis, seeking an accounting and the dissolution of the partnership. At the time of filing, Sorenson and Deis had only recouped $3,000 of their $7,500 loan. The trial court granted the dissolution, but found that it was in contravention of the partnership agreement. The court further found that Drashner was entitled to a distribution based only on the value of partnership property and not including the good-will value of the business. Since the assets were valued at less than the amount still owed to Sorenson and Deis, the court held that Drashner had no interest in the business and was entitled to nothing at dissolution. Drashner appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 129,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 177 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.