Dravo Equipment Co. v. German
Oregon Court of Appeals
698 P.2d 63 (1985)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
Dravo Equipment Co. (Dravo) (plaintiff) sold a used tractor with a rebuilt engine to a rock-crushing business, Brooks, Boyer and Bismark (BB & B). As part of the sale, BB & B obtained an express warranty that was bargained for separately. The warranty covered up to 1,500 hours of usage. BB & B sold their business to Jerry German and Crocker Hunter (collectively, German) (defendants). While negotiating the sale, German was shown a copy of the express warranty for the tractor. German believed that the express warranty would cover its usage of the tractor. After the sale was finalized, the tractor engine failed. German took the engine to Dravo for repairs, but Dravo denied any obligations under the warranty. Dravo eventually replaced the engine and billed German, and German refused to pay. Dravo filed a nonpossessory lien and initiated a suit. German’s sole defense was the express warranty. The trial court sided with German, finding that it was entitled to enforce the warranty. Dravo appealed, contending that German could not enforce the warranty because it was not privy to the initial transaction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rossman. J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.