Drewes Farms Partnership v. City of Toledo
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
441 F. Supp. 3d 551 (2020)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
After water pollution in Lake Erie contaminated drinking water in Toledo, Ohio (the city) (defendant), Toledo residents drafted a proposed municipal ordinance known as the Lake Erie Bill of Rights (LEBOR). A special election was held, resulting in a majority of voters approving LEBOR, and the ordinance was added to Toledo’s city charter. LEBOR purported to grant Lake Erie and the Lake Erie watershed the right to exist, flourish, and naturally evolve, and it purported to grant Toledo residents the right to clean and healthy water as well as the right to self-government. LEBOR also purported to criminalize the infringement of these rights by businesses or governments. LEBOR did not define the meanings of the rights it purported to grant. Drewes Farms Partnership (Drewes Farms) (plaintiff), a farming operation that grew crops in four counties near Toledo, sued the city, and the State of Ohio (plaintiff) intervened. Both Drewes Farms and Ohio asked the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to invalidate LEBOR because it was unconstitutionally vague. After determining that both Drewes Farms and Ohio had standing to bring the lawsuit, the court considered the validity of LEBOR.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Zouhary, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.