New York District Court
881 N.Y.S.2d 839 (2009)
Robert Drost (plaintiff) invited his girlfriend, Kim Hookey (defendant), to move in with him at his residence on Louisa Court in New York. Drost and Hookey lived at the residence for over three years. Thereafter, the couple had a falling out and Drost vacated the residence. Drost then filed a petition to evict Hookey from the home pursuant to section 713(7) of the New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL). The central issue was whether Hookey could be characterized as a “licensee,” which would have provided 10-days’ notice to vacate or as a “tenant at will,” which would have provided for 30-days’ notice to vacate the residence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hackeling, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.