DSC Communications Corp. v. Pulse Communications, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
170 F.3d 1354 (1999)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
DSC Communications Corporation (DSC) (plaintiff) manufactured software that telephone companies used in conjunction with DSC interface cards to provide telephone service. Functionally, each time a telephone company turned on a DSC interface card, it copied DSC’s software onto the card. DSC signed agreements with the telephone companies permitting them to use the software. The agreements prohibited the telephone companies from transferring the software, disclosing any information about the software, and using the software on any hardware besides hardware provided by DSC. Pulse Communications, Inc. (Pulsecom) (defendant) created compatible interface cards that telephone companies could use in the same way with DSC’s software. DSC sued Pulsecom for contributory copyright infringement, arguing that each time a telephone company turned on a Pulsecom interface card, it copied DSC’s software onto that interface card, which was an infringing act because Pulsecom did not have a right to the copyrighted software. DSC argued that Pulsecom assisted the telephone companies in this infringing act. Pulsecom moved for judgment as a matter of law. The district court granted the motion, finding that the telephone companies were owners of the DSC software and thus qualified for a software exception in the Copyright Act. Under the exception, an owner of a copy of computer software did not commit copyright infringement by copying the software if the copy was used solely as an essential step in actually using the software. DSC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.