United States Supreme Court
492 U.S. 195 (1989)
Eagan (defendant) attacked a woman and reported finding her body to police. When Eagan led police to the location, the woman recognized Eagan. Eagan claimed several men had abducted the woman. The case was handed off to the police department with jurisdiction. Before interrogating Eagan, police read a waiver form that advised him of his rights to remain silent and to consult with an attorney, but stated that “[the department has] no way of giving you a lawyer, but one will be appointed for you…if and when you go to court.” Eagan signed the waiver and repeated his story. Eagan was taken into custody and interrogated again the next day after reading a different Miranda waiver. Eagan confessed. The trial court admitted Eagan’s statements over his objection. Eagan was found guilty of attempted murder by a jury and sentenced to 35 years in prison. The appellate court affirmed. Eagan petitioned the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana for a writ of habeas corpus on the grounds that the waiver form was defective and the confession should not have been admitted. The court reversed because the waiver did not clearly convey Eagan’s right to consult with an attorney before the interrogation. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.