Dudley Sports Co. v. Schmitt

279 N.E.2d 266 (1972)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Dudley Sports Co. v. Schmitt

Indiana Court of Appeals
279 N.E.2d 266 (1972)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Danville High School purchased an automatic baseball-pitching machine from Dudley Sports Company (Dudley) (plaintiff). The machine was manufactured by another company but marketed by Dudley and bore a tag reading “Dudley Automatic Pitching Machine Dudley Sports Company, Inc.” At the high school, a school administrator and coach uncrated and assembled the machine. The delivery crate contained assembly instructions and a general warning tag referring to operating instructions, but the crate did not include any operating instructions. The assembled machine was placed in a storage room, unplugged. Unknown to student Joseph Schmitt (defendant), the pitching machine had a metal throwing arm, which, if in the “ten o’clock” position, could activate even if the machine was unplugged. The arm could activate with any slight vibration or change in atmospheric conditions. Schmitt entered the storage room to sweep, and the throwing arm activated, severely injuring Schmitt. Schmitt sued Dudley, alleging negligence in design and manufacturing. A jury found in favor of Schmitt, and the trial court entered judgment accordingly. Dudley appealed, arguing that it did not manufacture the product.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Buchanan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership