Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Dudley v. Fridge

Supreme Court of Alabama
443 So. 2d 1207 (1983)


Facts

Bruce Dudley and others (plaintiffs) purchased a 100-acre tract of land and one-half of the land’s mineral rights. The land was subject to an oil and gas lease (the Daws lease) that reserved a one-eighth royalty for the lessor. The plaintiffs also purchased a 20.5-acre tract of land adjacent to the 100-acre tract. The plaintiffs owned all mineral rights on the adjacent tract. The plaintiffs issued an oil and gas lease to Harris Anderson (defendant) on the 20.5-acre tract in exchange for a royalty and a bonus. As part of the transaction, the plaintiffs also granted Anderson a one-tenth royalty interest in the minerals the plaintiffs owned on the 100-acre tract. The royalty deed stated that Anderson’s royalty was “subject to the present [Daws lease], and to be subject to any and all further leases at [the plaintiffs’] option.” Subsequently, the plaintiffs signed a new lease on the 100-acre tract with AMAX Petroleum Corporation (AMAX). The AMAX lease, which superseded the Daws lease, reserved for the plaintiffs a one-fourth royalty. AMAX attempted to pay Anderson one-tenth of the one-eighth royalty reserved for the plaintiffs under the Daws lease. Anderson claimed that he was owed one-tenth of the one-fourth royalty the plaintiffs reserved under the AMAX lease. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that Anderson was entitled to one-tenth of the one-eighth royalty. The trial court ruled that under the terms of the royalty deed, Anderson was entitled to one-tenth of the one-fourth royalty. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Almon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.