Superior Court of New York City
14 N.Y.S. 134 (1891)
Russell (defendant) entered into a contract with Duff (plaintiff) to become a member of his opera company. Russell agreed to appear as a soprano for two seasons in any operas that Duff produced. Russell agreed to give seven performances a week. The agreement also provided that Duff would supply the costumes for the operas. The agreement did not explicitly provide that Russell could not perform in other shows. At the end of the second season, Russell not only refused to perform for Duff, but she had agreed to perform for a rival company. Russell complained that the costume Duff provided, namely the tights that she was required to wear, were unhealthy. Just before refusing to perform for Duff, Russell sent a letter to Duff informing him that she would perform in the upcoming opera, including wearing the required tights, if he would increase her pay. After Russell quit, Duff was unable to replace Russell for the remainder of the season with an actress and singer who had the same qualifications and reputation as Russell. Duff sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin Russell from performing for his rival. The injunction was granted. Russell appealed to the Superior Court of New York City to determine whether the injunction was proper.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.