Duffey v. Commissioner

91 T.C. 81 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Duffey v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
91 T.C. 81 (1988)

KL

Facts

William and Frieda Duffey (plaintiffs) were assessed a tax deficiency by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant). The Duffeys challenged the assessment in the United States Tax Court. The IRS alleged that the Duffeys received unreported income from the distribution of illegal drugs and used trusts to hold title to assets purchased with the unreported income, and that the failure to report that income constituted fraud. The Duffeys were represented in the matter by G. Alohawiwoole Altman and had hired another attorney as cocounsel, who the Duffeys were paying an hourly fee. Altman had prepared the Duffeys’ tax returns in previous years and was the attorney for the Duffeys’ trusts. The IRS filed a motion to disqualify Altman. The IRS asserted that it intended to call Altman as a witness to testify as to whether the Duffeys concealed the unreported income from him, their tax-return preparer, which was related to the issue of fraud. The Duffeys argued that Altman’s disqualification would cause them substantial hardship because Altman had familiarity with their finances and because Altman was representing them pro bono and they could not afford to hire an attorney.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Korner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership