Duffy v. Milder

896 A.2d 27 (2006)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Duffy v. Milder

Rhode Island Supreme Court
896 A.2d 27 (2006)

Facts

The Poncelet family owned a farm, where they rode and bred horses. The town in which the farm was located revised its zoning code in a way that would have restricted the Poncelets’ use of their property as a horse farm. However, the Poncelets were permitted to continue the horse farm as a prior nonconforming use. The Poncelets eventually sold the land, known as Lot 24 and Lot 28, to James and Paula Malm. The Malms intended to use the land for a condominium development. The Malms successfully petitioned the town to rezone the property in preparation for this development. The new zoning classification also prohibited horse farms. The condominium project was completed on Lot 28. The Malms then sold Lot 24 to Larry and Lisa Milder (defendants). The Milders were interested keeping horses on the property. The Milders began keeping horses on the property, along with a number of other animals. The town then began citing the Milders for zoning violations. The Milders filed a complaint in court, seeking a declaratory judgment that maintaining horses on Lot 24 constituted a lawful nonconforming user. The Milders’ neighbors, the Duffys (plaintiffs), were granted permission to intervene. The Duffys then moved for summary judgment, requesting the court to declare that the zoning ordinance prohibited the Milders from keeping horses on Lot 24. The Duffys argued that the use of the property as a horse farm was abandoned as a matter of law before the Milders purchased the land. The court ruled in favor of the Milders, holding that keeping horses on Lot 24 was a legal nonconforming and permitted use. The Duffys appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaherty, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership