Dugger v. Arredondo
Supreme Court of Texas
408 S.W.3d 825 (2013)
Geoffrey Dugger (defendant) and Joel Martinez drank, smoked marijuana, and snorted black-tar heroin. Martinez passed out and started choking. Dugger did not call 911 immediately, and when he did, he did not inform the paramedics that Martinez had snorted heroin. Martinez died less than two hours later. Martinez’s mother, Mary Ann Arredondo (plaintiff) brought a wrongful death suit against Dugger, alleging negligence. Dugger asserted as an affirmative defense the unlawful acts doctrine, citing Martinez’s use of illegal drugs. The trial court granted Dugger’s motion for summary judgment based on this doctrine. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the case for trial. Dugger appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Green, J.)
Dissent (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.