Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.

144 S.W.2d 878 (1940)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Texas
144 S.W.2d 878 (1940)

SC

Facts

Alexander Gilmer conveyed a tract of land to W.J. Duhig, but reserved an undivided one-half interest in the minerals. Subsequently, Duhig conveyed the tract to Miller-Link Lumber Company (Miller-Link) by general warranty deed. Miller-Link’s deed stated: “But it is expressly agreed and stipulated that the grantor herein retains an undivided one-half interest in and to all mineral rights or minerals of whatever description in the land.” This deed did not expressly mention Gilmer’s reserved one-half mineral interest. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co. (Peavy-Moore) (plaintiff) later acquired Miller-Link’s interest. Peavy-Moore brought suit against Mrs. W.J. Duhig and others (defendants), seeking to establish its claim to a one-half mineral interest. The defendants claimed that Duhig had reserved a one-half mineral interest, in addition to the one-half mineral interest that Gilmer reserved. The trial court found in favor of the defendants. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals reversed. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smedley, Commr.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership