Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Duk v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
320 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2003)


Facts

Fernando Duk (plaintiff) was drunk and disruptive at the casino of the MGM Grand Hotel, Inc. (MGM) (defendant). MGM’s security guards arrested Duk for his behavior. Duk’s wife called MGM’s security and informed them that Duk was an insulin-dependent diabetic. While in the detention room, Duk complained of lung and chest pains. MGM security called an ambulance and informed the EMTs of the lung pains, but not the chest pains. Duk was examined and later taken to jail. When he was released the next day he went to a hospital and found out that he had suffered a heart attack and as a result required a heart transplant. Duk brought suit against MGM for personal injuries resulting from MGM security’s negligence. Under Nevada law, a court will only award damages to plaintiffs who are 50 percent negligent or less. The jury was so instructed. Nonetheless, the jury returned a verdict stating that Duk was 65 percent negligent, but should be awarded $3.3 million. The district court noted the inconsistency and returned the verdict to the jury for further deliberations. Soon after, the jury returned a second verdict which stated that Duk was only 49 percent negligent and kept his damages at $3.3 million. MGM then filed a motion for a new trial based on the difference between the verdicts. The district court granted the motion and at the second trial the jury returned a verdict for MGM. Duk appealed the judgment of the district court granting the motion for new trial and the subsequent, second judgment on the merits.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hawkins, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.