Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
438 U.S. 59 (1978)
The Price-Anderson Act of 1957 established limits to the liability which operators of nuclear power plants would face in the event of a nuclear accident. After the Act was renewed in 1975, Duke Power Company (defendant) began to construct two new nuclear power plants in North Carolina and South Carolina. Carolina Environmental Study Group (plaintiff), along with a labor union and 40 individuals who lived near the sites of the new power plants, filed suit in federal court against Duke Power and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to challenge the constitutionality of the Price-Anderson Act. The district court found that the plaintiffs had standing and concluded that the Act was unconstitutional. Duke Power petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.