Duke v. Garcia
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
2014 WL 1318646 (2014)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Tiar Duke (plaintiff) defaulted on her car loan. The secured party hired Access Auto Recovery to repossess the car. Gustavo Soto, the owner of Access Auto, and his employee Jerome Baca (defendants) entered onto Duke’s property to repossess the car. Duke confronted Soto and Baca, and a verbal and physical altercation ensued. Duke repeatedly told Soto and Baca to leave her property and called 911. When the police arrived, they intervened and facilitated the repossession of the car. Duke sued Soto and Access Auto, alleging that Soto trespassed on her property. Duke also alleged Soto violated the state law governing repossession by remaining on the property and repossessing the car after a breach of the peace occurred.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baldock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.