Duluth Superior Excursions v. Makela
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
623 F.2d 1251 (1980)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Flamingo Excursions, Inc. (Flamingo) and Duluth Superior Excursions, Inc. (Duluth) (plaintiffs) hosted a booze cruise, that is, a cruise with alcohol, on the S.S. Flamingo. Flamingo owned the vessel, and Duluth operated it. Joseph Makela (defendant) took the booze cruise. Shortly after disembarking, Makela was hit by a car driven by another person who had attended the event. The accident occurred approximately six minutes after the S.S. Flamingo had docked. Makela engaged an attorney who sent notice to Flamingo and Duluth that Makela planned to bring a tort action against the companies in state court. Flamingo and Duluth then filed an action in federal district court arguing that the Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Act, a federal statute, limited their liability for any state-law tort claim made by Makela. Makela then filed his suit in state court, alleging that his injury was caused by the inadequate supervision of the S.S. Flamingo’s passengers, who became intoxicated on the cruise. While Makela’s claim in state court was pending, the district court dismissed Flamingo and Duluth’s action, finding that the district court lacked admiralty jurisdiction to hear the action. Flamingo and Duluth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 795,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.